Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Kelsey Smith-Briggs' Mother Gets No Money From Lawsuit Settlement
Posted by Divotdawg at 1:41 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: abolish cps, corrupt social workers, cps failure to do their jobs, cps failure to protect, Kelsey Smith-Briggs, Raye Dawn Smith, social worker incompetency
Minnesota Juvenile Court Video Link
- Identify the people who will be involved in the child protection case and who will be in the courtroom (e.g., judge, court reporter, court attendant, county attorney, social worker, guardian ad litem, attorneys, etc.);
- Explain the parent's legal rights and responsibilities;
- Describe the juvenile court process, including the types of hearings (e.g., EPC, Admit/Deny, Disposition, Review, Permanency) that the parent may be required to attend and what happens at a typical hearing;
- Explain how the juvenile court process may affect the parent and the child and what will happen after court; and
- Emphasize that the child's best interests are at stake and timely resolution of the problems causing risk of harm to the child is important to the healthy development of the child.
Posted by Divotdawg at 1:23 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: abolish cps, anti-cps, corrupt CPS, corrupt family court judges, corrupt foster care, corrupt social workers, cps legally kidnapping, cps reform
Move On? Yeah, Right! How Am I Supposed To Do THAT???
Written by: Denise Dopkins
February 10, 2010
Raped by the State
© All Rights Reserved
Reprinted with permission
I genuinely invite anyone to explain to me their definition of 'move on'. Does that mean that the parent should just sail off into the wild blue yonder and live as if this tragedy never happened to them and their children? Does it mean that those parents wounded by the unreasonable and even illegal actions of state agents should not work to affect change in the child welfare system? Does 'move on' mean that the parent should be silent and not warn the general public of the dangers of becoming entrapped by CPS? Yes... I said entrapped.
I Had To Flee Britain To Stop My Baby Being Snatched By The State
Baby "Snatched" From Mother Minutes After Birth Is Ordered BACK Into Foster Care
Posted by Divotdawg at 12:08 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: abolish cps, abolish foster care, corrupt CPS, corrupt cps in england, corrupt family court judges, corrupt foster care, federal adoption bonus money
How Social Services Are Paid Bonuses to Snatch Babies For Adoption
Posted by Divotdawg at 12:08 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: abolish cps, corrupt CPS, corrupt cps in england, corrupt family court judges, corrupt social workers, CPS legally kidnappings, cps reform, federal adoption bonus money
New York State Taking Away Parental Rights! MUST ACT TODAY!
Editor's Note: I'm just posting this in case any of my readers need or want the following information.
NYS taking away parental rights! MUST ACT TODAY!
frankseabrook.com/2010/02/09/nys-taking-away-parental-rights-must-act-today/
In Health Care on February 9, 2010 at 12:36 pmIF IT PASSES THE SENATE, IT WILL EASILY PASS THE ASSEMBLY- WE MUST ACT NOW!
OPPOSE BILL S4779/ A6702
Diseases to be Given to New York Children WITHOUT Parental Consent (S4779
<” target=_blankhttp://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=S04779> and A6702
<” target=_blankhttp://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=A06702> )
Spending Just a Few Minutes Can Make a Difference:
We Oppose S4779 and A6702 which permit ALL present and future vaccines and drugs for sexually transmitted diseases to be given to New York children WITHOUT parental consent.
Posted by Divotdawg at 12:08 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: anti-cps, corrupt CPS, corrupt social workers, cps reform, drugging children, fight cps, forced vaccinations, loss of parental rights, parental rights
Appeals Court Upholds Oklahoma DHS Lawsuit
CHILD WELFARECLASS ACTION STATUS GRANTED FOR ALLEGATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN FOSTER CARE PLACEMENT
BY RANDY ELLIS The Oklahoman Comments
4
Children’s Rights, a New York-based child advocacy organization, is spearheading the federal lawsuit against the state Department of Human Services for alleged violations of the civil rights of children in state custody.
The organization alleges that DHS routinely places abused, deprived and neglected children in "unsafe, unsupervised and unstable situations” where they are at risk of suffering further abuse and sometimes death.
In fighting the class action designation, DHS attorneys argued that abuse is suffered by only a small percentage of children (1.2 percent, according to the Children’s Rights complaint), and that it would be wrong to classify all state foster children as being at risk.
"This argument entirely misses the mark,” the appeals court wrote in its decision. "Logically, the fact that 1.2 percent of OKDHS foster children reported abuse or neglect does not mean the rest of the class was not exposed to an impermissible risk of serious harm. In theory, 100 percent of foster children could live under an imminent threat of serious harm, but only 1.2 percent ultimately suffer and report abuse or neglect.”
Marcia Robinson Lowry, executive director of Children’s Rights, said she is "very pleased” with the decision and looks forward to proceeding with fact-finding concerning how children are being treated in Oklahoma.
Don Bingham, one of the attorney’s representing DHS, said Monday’s court ruling involved a "narrow point of law” and the trial court could still decertify the lawsuit’s class action status at any time.
"We look forward to the opportunity to demonstrate to the court’s satisfaction that this litigation is unnecessary,” Bingham said. "We remain confident that the ultimate resolution will find that OKDHS provides excellent care for children, without the need for lengthy, expensive litigation and federal court oversight.”
Among other remedies, Children’s Rights wants the federal court to issue an injunction limiting caseloads of Oklahoma child welfare workers to 15 foster children each, a national standard recommended by the Child Welfare League of America.
Lowry said it is difficult to determine caseloads because the state apparently doesn’t track children who are transferred to caseworkers outside the county where they were taken into custody.
The caseloads of some are "well over 40.”
Posted by Divotdawg at 12:07 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: abolish cps, abolish foster care, anti-cps, broken and corrupt foster care, corrupt CPS, corrupt foster care, corrupt social workers, cps reform, cps sucks, fight cps, foster child death and abuses
UPDATE: Stalled Probe of Foster Child's Death Failed to Address Key Questions
Nearly seven weeks after the tragic death of 4 1/2-year-old Amariana Crenshaw in January 2008, Sacramento police made a somber announcement.
The Spoiled Under 30 Crowd
Editor's Note: I realize this is a destroy CPS blog and really, this posting hasn't anything to do with that but I thought it was cute and funny so I'll put a CPS spin on it. If we don't buy Little Tommy or Little Sally the latest state of the art toys and gizmos, are they going to report us to CPS for neglect or abuse? Maybe they won't but what about their teachers or their friends' parents? Somehow it just wouldn't surprise me, lol. Sometimes I need a diversion and since this is MY blog and can technically do whatever I want, I do try to stay on topic but this was just too cute and since it IS about children, I thought...what the heck!
longislandentrepreneurs.wordpress.com/
I just got this from a friend in Sweden. And thinking about David Gussin’s remark about his daughter saying “Who is John Wayne” I thought you guys would like this.
Yvonne
When I was a kid, adults used to bore me to tears with their tedious diatribes about how hard things were. When they were growing up; what with walking twenty-five miles to school every morning…. Uphill… Barefoot… BOTH ways Yadda, yadda, yadda
And I remember promising myself that when I grew up, there was no way in hell I was going to lay a bunch of crap like that on my kids about how hard I had it and how easy they’ve got it!
But now that . . . I’m over the ripe old age of thirty, I can’t help but look around and notice the youth of today.
You’ve got it so easy! I mean, compared to my childhood, you live in a damn Utopia! And I hate to say it, but you kids today, you don’t know how good you’ve got it!
I mean, when I was a kid we didn’t have the Internet. If we wanted to know something, we had to go to the damn library and look it up ourselves, in the card catalogue!!
There was no email!! We had to actually write somebody a letter – with a pen!
Then you had to walk all the way across the street and put it in the mailbox, and it would take like a week to get there! Stamps were 10 cents!
Child Protective Services didn’t care if our parents beat us. As a matter of fact, the parents of all my friends also had permission to kick our ass! Nowhere was safe!
There were no MP3′ s or Napsters! If you wanted to steal music, you had to hitchhike to the damn record store and shoplift it yourself!
Or you had to wait around all day to tape it off the radio, and the DJ would usually talk over the beginning and @#*% it all up! There were no CD players! We had tape decks in our car. We’d play our favorite tape and “eject” it when finished, and the tape would come undone.. Cause – that’s how we rolled, dig?
We didn’t have fancy crap like Call Waiting! If you were on the phone and somebody else called, they got a busy signal, that’s it!
There weren’t any freakin’ cell phones either. If you left the house, you just didn’t make a damn call or receive one. You actually had to be out of touch with your “friends”. OH MY GOD !!! Think of the horror.. And then there’s TEXTING . yeah , right. You kids have no idea how annoying you are.
And we didn’t have fancy Caller ID either! When the phone rang, you had no idea who it was! It could be your school, your mom, your boss, your bookie, your drug dealer, a collections agent, you just didn’t know!!! You had to pick it up and take your chances, mister!
We didn’t have any fancy Sony Playstation video games with high-resolution 3-D graphics! We had the Atari 2600! With games like ‘Space Invaders’ and ‘Asteroids’. Your guy was a little square! You actually had to use your imagination!! And there were no multiple levels or screens, it was just one screen… Forever! And you could never win. The game just kept getting harder and harder and faster and faster until you died! Just like LIFE!
You had to use a little book called a TV Guide to find out what was on! You were screwed when it came to channel surfing! You had to get off your ass and walk over to the TV to change the channel! NO REMOTES!!!
There was no Cartoon Network either! You could only get cartoons on Saturday Morning. Do you hear what I’m saying? We had to wait ALL WEEK for cartoons, you spoiled little rat-bastards!
And we didn’t have microwaves. If we wanted to heat something up, we had to use the stove! Imagine that!
That’s exactly what I’m talking about! You kids today have got it too easy. You’re spoiled. You guys wouldn’t have lasted five minutes back in 1980 or before!
Regards,
The Over 30 Crowd
Posted by Divotdawg at 12:06 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: 10 worst states for social worker incompetency, abolish cps, anti-cps, corrupt CPS, corrupt social workers, cps reform, cps sucks, destroy cps, fight cps
When One Adoptive Parent Dies Before Adoption Finalized Adoption is Voided Says New York State Court
Posted by Divotdawg at 12:05 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: abolish cps, abolish foster/adoptions, anti-cps, corrupt CPS, corrupt family court judges, corrupt foster care, cps reform, fight cps
The Seminal - Going to DC to Support Low Income Moms ~ Wanna Join Us?
I know poverty is not as "sexy" as say, Sarah Palin’s screeds, but I am a life long low income worker and mother. I also know I am joined by about the very least 30,000,000 – 50,000,000 other low income American families who’ve suffered as I have in the struggle to support my family. So perhaps I am at the very least worth a read …
I have never made enough money to support my family, even though I labored for a very low-income and paid taxes for over 35 years. I am radical about mothering and other caregiving being a full time job that should be counted as "work" with Welfare Reform and Social Security. At this time parenting and caregivingis not "work", it is actually considered, “doing nothing” according to Robert Rector,on NPR a few years ago, who is a Heritage Foundation member, who wrote “The Personal Responsibility Act” (Welfare Reform), which took welfare out from under Social Security and destroyed its entitlement.
On February 24th, I will be in Washington DC with some incredible women with my organization, Parents Organizing For Welfare and Economic Rights (P.O.W.E..R..)including LIFLINE from California, the Rebecca Project from DC, and many other amazing activists from around the country. Many if not most of us are low income or have been low income mothers ourselves.
While I am adamantly for welfare support and more, I will be trying to raise awareness about how TANF monies is being used to actually destroy low income families instead of preserving them.
In 1996 Welfare Reform took welfare out from under Social Security and became "discretionary" instead of an "entitlement”. Meaning that it was at the legislature’s "discretion" as to how to fund TANF after President Clinton signed it into law in 1996. Title IV-E is monies used to fund adoption and take children away, foster care, funding non-profits, consultants, CASA, and a myriad of others who stand to financially benefit from the “Foster Family Industrial Complex” mostly from poor families, and is bottomless as it is attached to Social Security.
Because my family has been a victim of CPS, I discovered that low income families are being "harvested" for adoption monies. Turns out that because of Title IV-E funding, it is actually "cheaper" than leaving a kid in the home to jerk them away from their families and adopt them out, than to give low income families the assistance they need to stay intact. Even though study after study shows these kids actually do better if left in their birth families.
Why is this happening to families even though it is widely known children do better kept at home? According to the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform, literally 1000 times more money is being used to destroy (mostly poor) families than to preserve them. 7.4 billion dollars to take children and adopt them out versus a mere $660 million used nationally to preserve families.
So I began to poke around to try to find how this whole thing was funded in my own state. Shockingly, I found that the information, though it is supposed to be public, is hidden. Furthermore my state has not been monitored in over 6 years by the Feds. In other words they hand over Title IV-E and TANF billions with no questions asked.
If you think this is only my state, you are wrong. This is a national phenomena and families all over the nation are being victimized by the taking of their children. With allegations that have little or no accountability by the government employees (CPS. CASA, non-profit agencies, the courts, and paid consultants) who can make them because families have no recourse (relatives and grandparents have none) to defend themselves. This is because those making th allegations are also funded by the virtually bottomless Title-IV-E monies for their jobs and resources and depend on one another to back each other up to keep it that way.
How does this involve TANF (welfare)? Some of the "strings" attached to this already paltry funding from the feds to the states for low income families, is also being diverted and added to Title IV-E for taking kids instead of family preservations. Even though study after study proves children fare better in their own birth families. Literally over 1000 times more ~ 7.4 BILLION DOLLORS for adoption compared to a paltry $660 Million dollars (more than 1000th the money to take kids) that is used to preserve families. They get nothing for leaving kids in their family home
The NCCPR is a progressive organization lead by a Progressive named, Richard Wexler (no relation to our Progressive former Congressman Robert Wexler, I asked, lol) who is trying to get the word out about the horrible fate for many children because it is cheaper and states get more money to take them away from their mothers.
Right now and unfortunately, the Tea Baggers are the loudest voice for Family Preservation. My attempts to speak to this with Progressive legislators has gone nowhere because it now has a “reputation” it does not deserve.
But as Mr. Wexler and many Progressives such as Dependency Lawyers, counselors, CPS workers and others have pointed out to me, Tea Baggers are right on about this issue. As is pointed out by NCCPR, the officials are more concerned about the one child that slips through the cracks rather than the thousands of kids being traumatized by being taken away from their families. No wonder the anger and despair is so prevalent to know the truth that families and parents have few rights in our US Court System, they are considered “outsiders” to the courts, CPS workers and CASAs instead of being partners. These are families who literally face “the fox watching the chicken coop” families and parents not being heard or properly defended when it comes to standing up for their rights.
More tragically is that welfare monies (TANF) is not being fully used for what it is desperately supposed to do. Instead much of it is diverted to other sources when it is already paltry and does not even begin to answer the issues for low income families. Money that could be used for education, housing, food, financial support, childcare, and other services families need every day, whether upper income or low income.
If you cannot come to DC, please write Representative McDermott who is chair of the sub-committee on Ways and Means that finance TANF. Let him know you do not approve of the way TANF monies is being diverted to destroy families and that it is important low income families are preserved, not harvested for children to adopt out. Families need support, children need their families, it is plain and simply WRONG to use our tax dollars to tear families apart instead of helping them find the resources they need to survive.
Pklease give me a little space for not being "professional" enough in this posting. After all, I am, "just a poor dumb woman who is ignorant …" as many DSHS experts assume.
Thanks you for your time
Cat In Seattle
Posted by Divotdawg at 12:05 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: anti-cps, ASFA bonus money, corrupt family court judges, corrupt CPS, corrupt family court judges, corrupt social workers, cps legally kidnapping, poverty and cps, TANF, Title IV-E funding
Electric Chair
Editor's Note: I came across this and wanted to post it because it's funny. Of course CPS isn't really in her life, I'm sure, and she was making a funny comment but she doesn't realize how true it probably is. Anyway, I posted it for a laugh. It's not meant to be anything more than that. The last sentence is the punch line but you have to read the whole article to understand.
suburbancorrespondent.blogspot.com/2010/02/not-dead-yet.html
Well! I've been berated in the last post's comments for not showing up here for 6 days. I'm glad someone missed me. We had to travel for a funeral last week (my mother's, actually) and we just got back. The kids cried the whole time. For their grandmother? No. They were sobbing because we were missing a (rare) huge snowstorm back home. They spent all of Saturday watching the Weather Channel.
They cheered up considerably, however, when they realized the TV room contained a motorized recliner, some days. They were delighted that, at the push of a button, the chair would go slo-o-owly up and forward; another button, it would go slo-o-owly back down. They took turns. They were amused for far longer than the 15 minutes or so normal children would enjoy such a contraption.
An hour. They played in it for an hour. All the while watching close-ups of snow-covered cars and fallen trees; and listening to bundled-up weather correspondents squinting into the camera and talking about "Snowmageddon"....
And the next morning? As soon as I came downstairs, Rachel came running over to me. "Mommy!" she begged. "Can we play in the electric chair?"
Just one more thing to explain to those nice people at Child Protective Services...
Posted by Divotdawg at 12:05 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: anti-cps, broken and corrupt foster care, corrupt CPS, corrupt family court judges, corrupt social workers, cps reform, cps sucks, fight cps
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
What Are Your Thoughts on Foster Care (CPS)? Do You Agree With The System? Please Read...Another Foster Child Death
According to a Detroit Free Press article, Adams-Rogers "had a history of complaints alleging mistreatment of children in her home. Though Child Protective Services never substantiated any of the nine complaints, people familiar with the child welfare system say the allegations should have raised red flags about what was going on in the brick home on Greenlawn in northwest Detroit." But Adams-Rogers may not have been the one who inflicted the fatal blows. Her twelve-year-old daughter, one of three children Adams-Rogers adopted from foster care, stands accused of inflicting the final injury. There were at least seven children in the home at the time of Isaac's death.
A news report stated that before his death, Isaac's child welfare caseworker was aware of bruises on the child, inflicted while he was in custody, but did nothing to move the child from his dangerous foster home or protect him from further injury. His sister, who had been placed in the same home, also bore the signs of injuries at the time of her younger brother's death.
I'd like to say this is a unique situation, but tragically, it is not. Hundreds of children have died violently in foster homes, many at the hands of the adults paid to take care of them. As owner of a large family rights website, FightCPS, I've kept an ongoing blog documenting cases like this one since 2001. Caseworkers often don't remove children from abusive foster homes because there's no financial motivation for the agency to do so. They remove children from their natural family homes much more readily because as soon as they do, federal financial streams are available to enrich the counties that detain children.
In Isaac's case, his parents are accused of neglect due to poverty. They are not accused of abuse. He could have been better served by allowing the parents to learn to take appropriate care of their child while keeping custody of him. But now it is too late; he's dead due to our country's child welfare laws that destroy and harm nearly every family they affect.
According to an article in the Isaac Lethbridge file, he is the third child to die violently in a Michigan foster home within the last 18 months. Ricky Holland, age 7, was adopted out of foster care then killed by his adopters in July 2005. Allison Newman, age 2, died from blunt-force trauma injuries of unknown origin in September 2006. Apparently someone suggested she was "accidentally flung over a 12-foot balcony onto a hardwood floor." Who, I ask, "accidentally" throws a 2-year-old over a balcony? Allison's licensed foster 'mother' is jailed, charged with felony murder and involuntary manslaughter.
These children are the tip of the iceberg. An online memorial, In Memory of Children Protected to Death by CPS, posts dozens of names and photos of children who died in state custody foster homes in nearly every state of this nation. And these are only the ones that site owner can find names and photos for. Many more children have died in foster homes without coming to the public's attention.
http://www.gather.com/viewImage.jsp?fileId=3096224744023908&a...
This link here above is a ling of Children/ Teenagers that have been killed in CPS custody.
Really is our State providing the proper Care for these Children?
This is from the CPS Brochure:
“Foster Care could be a group facility or could be a
private home where the parents are temporary
caregivers who have been LICENSED by the state”
Licensed by the state, What are the requirements for to be LICENSED by the state? Is the US really looking into people backgrounds and history on these folks? Are they handing off to people who just have a home with space provided?
Do they need to come up with a new system or requirements with the family they stick these Children with?
THIS LINK HERE IS THE STEP PROCEDURES & REQUIREMENTS
https://www.azdes.gov/dcyf/adoption/
IN MY OPINION WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE HOW CLOSELY STAFF AT CPS ARE LOOKING AT THESE HOMES OR CPR NEEDS TO CHANGE SOMETHING IN ITS SYSTEM
Canada - Children's Aid Told Girl at Risk to Self - Not to Others Yet Another Child Died in Foster Care
Editor's Note: Social workers or other CPS agents lie to everyone -- the judge, the parents, state attorneys, foster care providers and even to themselves. Now a small child is dead in foster care in Canada because of their negligence, lies and incompetency. They knew this child was a danger and she should have been properly taken care of to protect not only herself but to others. Without knowing the girl's history, it makes me wonder if she hasn't been a victim of the system for a long, long time.
Posted By Karena Walter
Posted 5 hours ago
www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2440389
Posted by Divotdawg at 1:28 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: 10 worst states for social worker incompetency, anti-cps, corrupt CPS, corrupt family court judges, corrupt foster care, corrupt social workers, cps reform, cps sucks, fight cps
DHS Analyzes Whether Age is a Factor in Abuse Investigations
kezi.com/page/161834
SALEM, Ore. -- Just last month, the Oregon Department of Human Services found it missed the warning signs of abuse with Jeanette Maples, a Eugene teen who was found dead in her home last year.
Now the agency is looking into whether age plays a factor when welfare workers choose which cases to investigate.
State investigators are looking at whether the flawed screenings in Jeanette Maples' case were due to individual misjudgments or a systemic problem of screeners relying upon a child's age as part of their evaluation of a child's vulnerability.
State investigators said Maples' age appears to have been considered as a major factor in the conclusion that she was not vulnerable.
Their audit of a sample of closed cases is expected to be completed by March 1st.
Posted by Divotdawg at 1:20 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: 10 worst states for social worker incompetency, anti-cps, corrupt CPS, corrupt foster care, corrupt social workers, cps legally kidnapping, cps reform, cps sucks, fight cps
Education Articles - Child Abuse and Neglect
Myths and facts about child abuse and neglect
Effects of child abuse and neglect
* Effects of child abuse and neglectCore feelings of being “worthless” or “damaged.” If you’ve been told over and over again as a child that you are stupid or no good, it is very difficult to overcome these core feelings. You may experience them as reality. Adults may not strive for more education, or settle for a job that may not pay enough, because they don’t believe they can do it or are worth more. Sexual abuse survivors, with the stigma and shame surrounding the abuse, often especially struggle with a feeling of being damaged.
* Trouble regulating emotions. Abused children cannot express emotions safely. As a result, the emotions get stuffed down, coming out in unexpected ways. Adult survivors of child abuse can struggle with unexplained anxiety, depression, or anger. They may turn to alcohol or drugs to numb out the painful feelings.
Emotional child abuse
* Calling names and making negative comparisons to others
* Telling a child he or she is “no good,” “worthless,” “bad,” or “a mistake.”
* Frequent yelling, threatening, or bullying.
* Ignoring or rejecting a child as punishment, giving him or her the silent treatment.
* Limited physical contact with the child—no hugs, kisses, or other signs of affection.
* Exposing the child to violence or the abuse of others, whether it be the abuse of a parent, a sibling, or even a pet.
Physical child abuse
* Lashing out in anger. Physically abusive parents act out of anger and the desire to assert control, not the motivation to lovingly teach the child. The angrier the parent, the more intense the abuse.
* Using fear to control behavior. Parents who are physically abusive may believe that their children need to fear them in order to behave, so they use physical abuse to “keep their child in line.” However, what children are really learning is how to avoid being hit, not how to behave or grow as individuals.
The problem of shame and guilt in child sexual abuse
Warning signs of child abuse and neglect
Warning signs of emotional abuse in children
* Shows extremes in behavior (extremely compliant or extremely demanding; extremely passive or extremely aggressive).
* Doesn’t seem to be attached to the parent or caregiver.
* Acts either inappropriately adult (taking care of other children) or inappropriately infantile (rocking, thumb-sucking, tantruming).
* Is always watchful and “on alert,” as if waiting for something bad to happen.
* Injuries appear to have a pattern such as marks from a hand or belt.
* Shies away from touch, flinches at sudden movements, or seems afraid to go home.
* Wears inappropriate clothing to cover up injuries, such as long-sleeved shirts on hot days.
* Hygiene is consistently bad (unbathed, matted and unwashed hair, noticeable body odor).
* Untreated illnesses and physical injuries.
* Is frequently unsupervised or left alone or allowed to play in unsafe situations and environments.
* Is frequently late or missing from school.
* Displays knowledge or interest in sexual acts inappropriate to his or her age, or even seductive behavior.
* Makes strong efforts to avoid a specific person, without an obvious reason.
* Doesn’t want to change clothes in front of others or participate in physical activities.
* An STD or pregnancy, especially under the age of 14.
* Runs away from home.
Risk factors for child abuse and neglect
* Alcohol and drug abuse. Living with an alcoholic or addict is very difficult for children and can easily lead to abuse and neglect. Parents who are drunk or high are unable to care for their children, make good parenting decisions, and control often-dangerous impulses. Substance abuse also commonly leads to physical abuse.
* Untreated mental illness. Parents who suffering from depression, an anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, or another mental illness have trouble taking care of themselves, much less their children. A mentally ill or traumatized parent may be distant and withdrawn from his or her children, or quick to anger without understanding why. Treatment for the caregiver means better care for the children.
* Lack of parenting skills. Some caregivers never learned the skills necessary for good parenting. Teen parents, for example, might have unrealistic expectations about how much care babies and small children need. Or parents who where themselves victims of child abuse may only know how to raise their children the way they were raised. In such cases, parenting classes, therapy, and caregiver support groups are great resources for learning better parenting skills.
* Stress and lack of support. Parenting can be a very time-intensive, difficult job, especially if you’re raising children without support from family, friends, or the community or you’re dealing with relationship problems or financial difficulties. Caring for a child with a disability, special needs, or difficult behaviors is also a challenge. It’s important to get the support you need, so you are emotionally and physically able to support your child.
How do you know when you’ve crossed the line?
* You feel emotionally disconnected from your child. You may feel so overwhelmed that you don’t want anything to do with your child. Day after day, you just want to be left alone and for your child to be quiet.
* Meeting the daily needs of your child seems impossible. While everyone struggles with balancing dressing, feeding, and getting kids to school or other activities, if you continually can’t manage to do it, it’s a sign that something might be wrong.
* Other people have expressed concern. It may be easy to bristle at other people expressing concern. However, consider carefully what they have to say. Are the words coming from someone you normally respect and trust? Denial is not an uncommon reaction.
Tips for changing your reactions
* Develop new parenting skills. While learning to control your emotions is critical, you also need a game plan of what you are going to do instead. Start by learning appropriate discipline techniques and how to set clear boundaries for your children. Parenting classes, books, and seminars are a way to get this information. You can also turn to other parents for tips and advice.
* Take care of yourself. If you are not getting enough rest and support or you’re feeling overwhelmed, you are much more likely to succumb to anger. Sleep deprivation, common in parents of young children, adds to moodiness and irritability—exactly what you are trying to avoid.
* Get professional help. Breaking the cycle of abuse can be very difficult if the patterns are strongly entrenched. If you can’t seem to stop yourself no matter how hard you try, it’s time to get help, be it therapy, parenting classes, or other interventions. Your children will thank you for it.
* Learn how you can get your emotions under control. The first step to getting your emotions under control is realizing that they are there. If you were abused as a child, you may have an especially difficult time getting in touch with your range of emotions. You may have had to deny or repress them as a child, and now they spill out without your control. For a step by step process on how you can develop your emotional intelligence, visit EQ Central.
Helping an abused or neglected child
Tips for talking to an abused child
* Don’t interrogate. Let the child explain to you in his or her own words what happened, but don’t interrogate the child or ask leading questions. This may confuse and fluster the child and make it harder for them to continue their story.
* Reassure the child that they did nothing wrong. It takes a lot for a child to come forward about abuse. Reassure him or her that you take what is said seriously, and that it is not the child’s fault.
* Safety comes first. If you feel that your safety or the safety of the child would be threatened if you try to intervene, leave it to the professionals. You may be able to provide more support later after the initial professional intervention.
* What if I break up someone’s home? The priority in child protective services is keeping children in the home. A child abuse report does not mean a child is automatically removed from the home – unless the child is clearly in danger. Support such as parenting classes, anger management or other resources may be offered first to parents if safe for the child.
* They will know it was me who called. Reporting is anonymous. In most states, you do not have to give your name when you report child abuse. The child abuser cannot find out who made the report of child abuse.
* It won’t make a difference what I have to say. If you have a gut feeling that something is wrong, it is better to be safe than sorry. Even if you don’t see the whole picture, others may have noticed as well, and a pattern can help identify child abuse that might have otherwise slipped through the cracks.
"Professional" Photographer Suspected of Taking Nude Shots of Young Teens
Posted by Divotdawg at 12:19 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: 10 worst states for social worker incompetency, anti-cps, corrupt CPS, corrupt social workers, cps reform, fight cps, sexual exploitation of children
Edinburg - Mother of Special Needs Student Upset Over Alleged Abuse (CPS Is Involved)
Posted by Divotdawg at 12:12 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: abusive teachers, anti-cps, corrupt CPS, corrupt school officials, corrupt social workers, cps reform, fight cps, special needs children abused by teachers
Monday, February 8, 2010
Paradise "Adoptive" Parents Accused of Fatal Child Abuse
Posted: 02/07/2010 12:00:00 AM PST
poundpuplegacy.org/node/42490 or www.paradisepost.com/news/ci_14350238
PARADISE -- Two parents in Paradise were arrested Saturday after Paradise police responded to a 1 a.m. 9-1-1 call and found an 8-year-old adopted girl in cardiac arrest.
A further search of the home in the 500 block of Crestwood Drive revealed another girl, 11, to have significant injuries due to child abuse, Paradise police said.
The younger victim was not breathing at the time of discovery but was later revived with life support at Feather River Hospital. However, she died en route after being transferred to Sutter Memorial Hospital in Sacramento.
The 11-year-old is hospitalized at Sutter.
Both children are the adopted daughters of Kevin Schatz, 46, and Elizabeth Schatz, 42, who have been arrested and booked into the Butte County Jail in Oroville on an open count of murder and child abuse, Paradise police said.
Seven other children have been taken into protective custody. The children were home-schooled. There was no history of child abuse at the home.
Police will continue to investigate the circumstances surrounding the incidents.
Caseworker Went to Texas Home Day Before Slayings
There was no indication that Elyse Marsyl Colon, 22, might harm her children when the caseworker visited the home Monday, said Mary Walker, a Texas Department of Family and Protective Services spokeswoman.
Authorities say Colon calmly surrendered to police officers outside her home Tuesday evening and told them "I killed my babies." The officers found the bodies of 3-year-old Jose Luis Garcia and 1-year-old Guillermo Garcia laying next to each other in a bed in the home.
"Words can't describe the scene," San Antonio police Chief William McManus said. "It was unspeakably sad."
After Colon was placed in the patrol car, she allegedly told police, "Their father was in jail, I want him to know."
Colon was being held Wednesday on two counts of capital murder. Her bond was set at $2 million, and she had no attorney listed in court records. She cursed at reporters while being taken to court for arraignment late Tuesday.
Caseworkers had visited the family from time to time since 2006, when Colon was accused of using drugs while pregnant with Jose Luis, Walker said. The drug tests were negative.
The agency had been helping Colon search for a job and for housing since the boys' father, Luis Alonso Garcia-Pacheco, was jailed last year on domestic abuse charges, Walker said. He has not entered a plea, and remains in Bexar County jail awaiting trial this month.
Garcia-Pacheco's attorney, Rudy Vasquez, said his client is innocent. Vasquez said he is trying to arrange for Garcia-Pacheco — who also has a federal immigration hold against him — to attend his children's funeral.
"He's pretty numb and he's kind of devastated," Vasquez said.
Walker said a caseworker dropped off a check with Colon's landlord on Monday before visiting the family. The caseworker talked to Colon about finding a job, and gave her a list of temporary positions that did not require experience.
Walker said she didn't know how long the caseworker stayed at the home. There were never any grounds to remove the children from the mother's care, she said.
"It appears the mother was receptive, responsive and cooperative," Walker said.
According to public records, Garcia-Pacheco was arrested in May 2009 for illegal entry and family assault. That month, Walker said welfare officials investigated a domestic abuse complaint at the home. Colon allegedly told investigators there had been violence, but that her sons were not harmed.
"She had been battered," Walker said. "The children were not."
Colon also had been accused of wrongdoing. In June 2008, there was an indication that Colon's second son tested positive at birth for methamphetamines, but that test results were ultimately negative, Walker said. A complaint that Colon had allegedly fallen while holding her child was later recanted, Walker said.
The attack occurred less than three miles from the home where prosecutors say a woman decapitated and butchered her 3-week-old boy last summer. The woman, Otty Sanchez, is charged with capital murder. She has not entered a plea, but her attorney has said she was not mentally stable at the time of the attack.
On Colon's street, neighbor Angelica Puentes, 34, said she had talked to the woman a couple of times and said she seemed like she was in a daze.
"They can't speak for themselves, they can't defend themselves," Puentes said. "They're very vulnerable right now. She just took advantage of that for whatever reason, I don't know."
L.A. County Shifts Approach to Children
Posted by Divotdawg at 12:04 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: abolish cps, another senseless death where corrupt CPS is involved, anti-cps, broken and corrupt foster care, corrupt CPS, corrupt social workers, cps reform, cps sucks, fight cps
Victims Angry With Government Over Abuse in Foster Care
An Edmonton lawyer who represents about 300 people abused in foster care has had a class-action suit against the Alberta government for the last seven years.
Robert Lee tells the Calgary Sun, problems that continue to hit the spotlight are not acted on and changes recommended after numerous reviews have not been implemented. He says he's disappointed to once again hear provincial authorities promising to deal with the chronic issues in the wake of sex charges against a Calgary foster parent.
Lee says the top issue in the system is abuse but there is also neglect with children simply falling through cracks.
Sex abuse charges were filed this past week against long-time foster parent Garry Prokopishin.
NCCPR Child Welfare Blog: Foster Care is Abusive, So Let's Have More Of It! "Children's Rights" and the Power of Doublethink
To read the story in its entirety, please visit...
Foster Care Is Abusive...
I had one of those Jon Stewart moments last week – one of those moments when someone says something that is either so outlandish or so obvious or simply such a contradiction of everything else that person says or does that it demands a quick, strong response.
Posted by Divotdawg at 12:03 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: abolish cps, abolish foster care, anti-cps, corrupt CPS, corrupt foster care, cps reform, cps sucks, fight cps, foster care sucks, foster child abuses, foster child abuses and deaths
Grandparents Blog: Avalanche of Anguish - Sexual Abuse in Foster Care
By DANA DiFILIPPO
Philadelphia Daily News
difilid@phillynews.com 215-854-5934
SHANNON BERTHIAUME knows she did something stupid, something she can't take back.
In a fit of frustration, the mother of three drove her minivan into a West Philadelphia elementary school in 2005 to protest the escalating racial bullying her kids had suffered there.
Although no one was seriously injured and the only damage was a scratch on the school door, Berthiaume was arrested and sentenced to a year of probation.
But her legal troubles were trivial compared to the avalanche of anguish that followed.
Social workers from the city's Department of Human Services took her kids away and kept them, pingponging between foster homes, for a year and a half.
When Berthiaume got them back, all three had been sexually molested in their foster homes, she said.
"My oldest son [then 14] came home bleeding from his rectum - a lot, like a woman bleeds [menstrually]," Berthiaume said.
That son, now 16, is in a group home for sex offenders, after DHS took him again when he molested his little brother. Her other two kids resent her for catapulting them into the misery that has marred their lives since their mother's arrest.
"DHS has destroyed my family," said Berthiaume, 37, wiping tears from her cheeks.
While judges and social workers often assume removing children from troubled homes will make them safer, the ordeal of Berthiaume and her family illustrates a disturbing epidemic in foster care:
Kids in foster homes are up to four times as likely to suffer sex abuse as other kids.
The odds worsen for kids unlucky enough to get placed in group homes and other institutional settings:
They're 28 times as likely to be sexually abused there, studies show.
And while predatory foster parents make the headlines, the abuse typically is child-on-child, experts agree.
As shocking as the statistics are, child advocates say sexual abuse occurs far more than even the most perverted mind can imagine.
"I've been doing this work for a long time and represented thousands and thousands of foster children, both in class-action lawsuits and individually, and I have almost never seen a child, boy or girl, who has been in foster care for any length of time who has not been sexually abused in some way, whether it is child-on-child or not," said Marcia Robinson Lowry, executive director of Children's Rights, a New York-based nonprofit.
"It is quite common."
They were the only white kids in the school.
That didn't matter to Berthiaume, who married a black man and whose youngest son's father is Puerto Rican.
But it apparently did matter to some of their classmates, who rarely let an opportunity pass to call them racial names, beat them or otherwise bully them, the family said.
"My kids would come home crying every day. They were afraid to go to school," she said.
Berthiaume complained repeatedly to the school, the district, local and state politicians and even the U.S. Department of Education.
She still has a dog-eared file thicker than a phone book of her various fruitless pleas to people for help.
Finally, in May 2005, with the abuse unabated, she planned a protest outside the school.
She made up signs and kept them in her van, waiting for the perfect opportunity.
But fury overtook patience on May 24, when she picked up her kids from school - only to hear that bullies had pounced on her 8-year-old in the bathroom as he relieved himself, yanking painfully on his privates as they called him names, she said.
"I snapped," she said of the day that led to years of tears.
Berthiaume locked her kids in the van and steered toward Huey's front door. Berthiaume said she merely parked the van at the door to protest her kids' treatment; police said she rammed it.
Either way, she got arrested and spent the night in jail. Although acquitted of all but one (simple assault) of the five charges against her, she was sentenced to a year of probation, court records show. The case is the only blemish on her otherwise clean criminal record.
After her arrest, DHS took her kids, then ages 8, 10 and 12, and put them in foster care.
The three bounced around between 15 different placements, according to DHS records. Berthiaume's daughter was moved most, hopscotching between eight foster homes, according to DHS records.
She remembers none fondly.
"A lot of homes hit me, they beat me. Some of the homes, I starved; they would sit down at the table and say: 'You can't sit at this table because you're not part of this family.' So I'd have to eat at school," said the girl, now 14.
The Daily News is withholding her and her siblings' names due to the sexual nature of their alleged abuse.
At one home, Berthiaume's daughter said, a foster parent choked and threatened her after wrongly assuming she scratched a foster baby in the home.
Worst was the teenage boy in one home who pinned her down and fondled her as she struggled to escape in May 2006. She was 10 years old. She and Berthiaume sued DHS for the incident and won a $25,000 settlement from the city and its subcontracted provider in which DHS admitted no fault, DHS records show.
In infrequent phone calls and supervised visits, Berthiaume learned of her kids' struggles in foster care and worked hard to get them back. She earned her GED and took classes in parenting, nutrition and anger management to demonstrate her worthiness as a parent.
Still, DHS kept her two youngest until August 2006 and the oldest until October 2006.
Aside from the assault on Berthiaume's daughter, none of the three reported any maltreatment in foster care, said Dell Meriwether, deputy commissioner of DHS' Children and Youth Division.
Berthiaume said she first learned her sons had been molested two weeks after her eldest came home.
She walked into the boys' bedroom and saw her sons, who had been lying under a blanket, jump up. She thought she had interrupted the eldest trying to molest the youngest, so she called her DHS social worker.
Meriwether said, DHS investigators determined the eldest boy had performed oral sex on his little brother and then threatened him with violence.
"That is a pretty significant incident," Meriwether said.
DHS removed the boy again, and police charged him with a sex crime.
The criminal charges eventually were dropped, but DHS placed the boy, now 16, in a group home for sex offenders where he remains today.
A Family Court judge ordered the other two children to undergo therapy.
Berthiaume said both boys told counselors they'd been repeatedly raped while in foster care, although neither reported the abuse to social workers and DHS has no records of such reports, Meriwether said.
Berthiaume has spent the past three years struggling to rebuild relationships soured from simmering resentments and long absences.
"I love my mom, but I ain't even speak to her now without arguing with her. I have anger issues," Berthiaume's daughter said recently. "This [foster experience] damaged me. I just think of that day [when Berthiaume got arrested at Huey], and I think: If she wanted to get us out, she could have did it in a different way. 'Cause now, we're living a nightmare."
Berthiaume wishes she could take that day back.
"I feel bad, because I take responsibility for my actions," she said, crying. "I take on that burden that I got them placed in the system. If I wouldn't have did what I did, they wouldn't have suffered like they did."
Her house is quiet now.
Berthiaume's husband, tired of the drama, moved out last month.
Her two sons are gone.
DHS refuses to return Berthiaume's eldest son, despite professing, as most social-service agencies do, that family preservation is a top priority.
"Preservation of the family can only be possible when all of the children in the family can be safely maintained," Meriwether said. Further, the child "has not completed his sexual-offender therapy. He still is addressing his mental and behavioral health issues. [And] Ms. Berthiaume has not completed the requisite family therapy."
The eldest boy's "victim" - Berthiaume's youngest son - moved to another state a few weeks ago to live with his biological father, weary of fighting with his mother and rehashing things in interminable court-ordered therapy.
"I live in a four-bedroom house with one child," Berthiaume said. "This has broken my family."
A DHS social worker made a surprise visit to Berthiaume's home for the first time in years last week, shortly after the Daily News began asking DHS about the family.
But Meriwether denied any ill intent.
"Because there's an active child in placement, safety assessment visits should be done every six months. Those were not being done, so your call prompted that," Meriwether said.
But Berthiaume feels unfairly targeted.
"I just wish they would leave my family alone so we can heal from this," Berthiaume said. "They're supposed to be a child-protection agency. They could have left them with me, and they'd be fine. But instead, they say I'm not fit to be a mom, and then they place them with other people who abuse them. They didn't protect my children."
Overburdened systems
Cases like Berthiaume's exasperate Richard Wexler.
Wexler heads the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform, a Virginia-based nonprofit that advocates family preservation.
"In every respect, this is a perfect microcosm of everything wrong with the Philadelphia child-welfare system," Wexler said. "This mother flew off the handle, but did nothing herself to harm her children. So these children were taken from a perfectly safe home only to be abused in foster care."
Fearful of the public criticism that comes after high-profile abuse deaths like Charlenni Ferreira and Danieal Kelly, Philadelphia is too quick to remove children from their biological homes, Wexler contended.
"Philadelphia takes away children at, by far, the highest rate of any major city," he said.
Philadelphia's rate of removal – entries into care divided by the number of impoverished children - is 31.3 children removed for every thousand impoverished children in the county, according to coalition statistics. The national average is 20.2.
"The more you overload your child-welfare system with children who don't need to be there, the greater the likelihood of abuse," Wexler said. "There are two reasons for that: You put your DHS in a position where they are begging for beds. Beggars can't be choosers, so there is an enormous incentive to lower standards for foster parents. The other problem is if you have too many children coming in, you cannot be careful about which foster children you put with other foster children. And one of the biggest problems in foster care is foster children abusing other foster children.
"The only way to fix foster care is to have less of it," Wexler added.
DHS Spokeswoman DeszereeThomas countered that DHS has been successful at reducing its removal rates, saying only 4,988 children were placed in foster homes, group homes, supervised independent living and other settings, as of fiscal year 2009. That's down about 20 percent from a recent high of 6,210 in fiscal year 2005, according to DHS data.
Thomas couldn't quantify how many of those children are in treatment as sex-abuse victims or offenders, saying such information isn't tracked centrally.
But the state Department of Public Welfare, which investigates reports of children abused in foster care, tallied 261 reported incidents statewide of sexual contact between children in foster homes in 2008 and 2009.
National studies suggest the actual incidence of abuse is far higher. For example, youths in foster care are at a higher risk of acquiring HIV, according to a 1999 Washington University study.
"If bad things happen to these children, for the most part, they're unreported," Robinson Lowry said. "And when a foster-care system does a really lousy job, there are really no consequences. These are systems that are usually isolated from public outcry (because of privacy protections). Very often, the only real accountability is when a system gets sued."
A family forever fractured?
Some kids dislike school.
Berthiaume's youngest son has sworn it off forever.
"I will never go back to a public school ever," he said.
Since getting her kids back in 2006, Berthiaume has home-schooled them, the family's faith broken in all public agencies.
She'd like to leave Philadelphia, the city that has brought her so much heartache. But she won't leave her eldest son behind.
So she waits to learn what else she must do to get him back.
"I shouldn't have felt driven to take matters into my own hands. I had this nightmare for five years. Where was the city for me? They're still failing me after all these years," she said of her unending battle to make her family whole. "Five years of people just turning their backs. It feels as though the weight of the world is on us. I'm tired."
http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/82231247.html
CBC News - Calgary - No Way to Guarantee Foster Children's Safety: Advocate
Last Updated: Sunday, February 7, 2010 | 2:22 PM MT
CBC News
John Mould, Alberta's Child and Youth Advocate, told CBC News allegations that a 51-year-old Calgary man allegedly offered money to three boys in his care in exchange for sexual acts are disappointing.
However, Mould said cases like this one are one of the realities of child welfare systems.
"You know, it's one of those things. One never wants it to happen but … it does happen," he said, adding that his office will work "to learn as much as possible about the circumstances of what happened here."
Children and Youth Services Minister Yvonne Fritz has called for an internal review of the case.
She said she will act quickly to implement any recommendations that might come out of the report.
But Mould said there is no way to guarantee that children are 100 per cent safe.
"There's no fool-proof screening mechanism that I'm aware of," he said.
"I think that lots and lots of effort is put into doing the best screening that the service system knows how to do … but I just don't think that there is an answer that would reassure people that if we did this the problem would disappear."
While the case has the province's Liberal party questioning the competency of the Department of Children and Youth Services, Fritz said incidences of abuse within the foster care system are very unusual.
LK YouTube Video - How To Make A Web Page (Part 1, 2 and 3)
In case someone wants to make a website for CPS reform (or destruction) I thought I'd share L.K.'s videos on how to build web pages. It's 3 videos and I have posted all three!
Posted by Divotdawg at 12:02 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: anti-cps, cps reform, fight cps, how to build a website videos, how to make a blog, how to make a website page, legally kidnapped
YouTube - LK Report for February 7th, 2010
Posted by Divotdawg at 12:01 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: abolish cps, abolish foster care, abolish foster/adoptions, anti-cps, corrupt CPS, corrupt foster care, cps failure to protect, cps reform, foster child abuses and deaths, legally kidnapped
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Fatal Misunderstandings About Reactive Attachment Disorder (Foster Children)
A number of myths about children are part of mistaken beliefs about the childhood mental health problem called Reactive Attachment Disorder and given the code 313.89 in DSM-IV-Tr. The criteria for Reactive Attachment Disorder involve children's age-inappropriate relationships with adults, with behaviors that are either less engaged and dependent than is typical for the child's developmental stage, or, alternatively, excessively dependent and "clingy" compared to other children of the same age. Regrettably, these criteria are little understood by the general public, but are replaced by myths and misunderstandings that are reinforced by careless journalists.
For example, the newsletter of a middle-western foster and adoption group
(http://www.mfcaa.org/img/files/newsletters/2010/Feb%202010%20News... ) claims that Reactive Attachment Disorder is characterized by the following symptoms: superficially charming behavior, refusal to make eye contact on parents' terms, "crazy lying", and false allegations of abuse, among other things. This misinformation is repeated by print and television journalists until "everybody knows" it's true-- even though it's obvious that this set of behaviors has little or nothing to do with Reactive Attachment Disorder as defined earlier.
The spread of misinformation is a problem for more reasons than one, and is especially problematic because misinformed people can easily make misinformed decisions. Such decisions have resulted in death and injury of children who have been mistreated systematically by caregivers, often with the encouragement of caseworkers. Michael Shermer, writing in "Scientific American" several years ago, referred to these adverse events as "death by theory", and indeed it is hard to see how such things could have occurred if the adults had not been blinded to the obvious by their beliefs about child development.
There have been quite a few reports of harm to children resulting from misinformed beliefs about Reactive Attachment Disorder. One account of an investigation of a foster home following the death of a child gives examples of these beliefs and their impact. Relevant correspondence and investigation reports may be seen at http://www.dleg.state.mi.us/fhs/brs/reports/CP140201012_SIR_2008C..., but I will refer to some of the important statements referring to beliefs held by the caseworkers in this situation. (I will omit some of the material dealing with carelessness in the original acceptance of these foster parents into the system.)
1. One child in the family had a tantrum in the car, and following the foster mother's actions to deal with this, complained that she had broken his leg. He was found to have a "linear displaced fracture of the proximal tibial epiphysis" [the growth plate area at the end of an immature bone] and a cast was applied. The caseworker said, however, "DHS believes it is possible that [he] never really felt any pain in his leg, that he was just using this as another control mechanism, and he is bewildered by the fact that he now has a cast on an injury that he was ‘inventing' in order to get the foster parent into trouble."
2. An anonymous referral said that a child had been locked out of the house on several occasions and had screamed and cried for close to an hour, begging to be let in (this was in December in Michigan). The caseworker, however, said the complaint was "consistent with her knowledge of [his] classic Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) behaviors, as he frequently yells and screams out toward foster mom, accusing her of mistreating him", and that he might have gone outside of his own accord and then taken the opportunity to accuse the caregiver.
3. One child was found locked naked in an abandoned outdoor shed. He was taken to the emergency room, where doctors expressed concern about bruises and bite marks on him. Two caseworkers stated their opinions that these marks were self-inflicted.
4. Another of the foster children stated that a foster parent had made her run barefoot in the snow for "discipline", made her run up and down the stairs in the middle of the night, dragged her through the mud as punishment, and sometimes withheld food. No investigation followed these disclosures.
Do these examples of mistreatment show anything other than the fact that human beings can be unbelievably cruel to children? I believe they do show something else: that the caseworkers who were supposed to advocate for the children believed that their treatment was appropriate. They had accepted some ideas current among unconventional therapists and frequently repeated by unwary journalists. These included the belief that complaints of pain or sickness by children said to have Reactive Attachment Disorder are all lies and attempts to manipulate and exploit other people. Also included was the belief that allegations of abuse by "RAD children" are always lies and attempts to cause trouble to their caregivers, even when there is physical evidence of injury. In addition, not only the individual caseworkers, but one or more of their supervisors apparently believed that pain, hunger, fear, and humiliation were appropriate treatments for children who were less than satisfactory to their caregivers.
Until we can correct these myths, and until we educate caseworkers, foster and adoptive parents, teachers, and the general public, about them, the most vulnerable of our children remain in real danger from those who are supposed to care for them. Please, journalists, take note, and do not exacerbate this problem by circulating dangerous mistaken beliefs!






